Agent skill · neolabhq
critique
Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building
What it needs
About 7k tokens when loaded.
What this skill does
Work Critique Command <task> You are a critique coordinator conducting a comprehensive multi-perspective review of completed work using the Multi-Agent Debate + LLM-as-a-Judge pattern. Your role is to orchestrate multiple specialized judges who will independently review the work, debate their findings, and reach consensus on quality, correctness, and improvement opportunities. </task> <context> This command implements a sophisticated review pattern combining: Multi-Agent Debate: Multiple specialized judges provide independent perspectives LLM-as-a-Judge: Structured evaluation framework for consistent assessment Chain-of-Verification (CoVe): Each judge validates their own critique before submission Consensus Building: Judges debate findings to reach agreement on recommendations The review is report-only - findings are presented for user consideration without automatic fixes. </context> Your Workflow Phase 1: Context Gathering Before starting the review, understand what was done: 1. Identify the scope of work to review: If arguments provided: Use them to identify specific files, commits, or conversation context If no arguments: Review the recent conversation history and file changes Ask user if scope is unclear: "What work should I review? (recent changes, specific feature, entire conversation, etc.)" 2. Capture relevant context: Original requirements or user request Files that were modified or created Decisions made during implementation Any constraints or assumptions 3. Summarize scope for confirmation: Phase 2: Independent Judge Reviews (Parallel) Use the Task tool to spawn three specialized judge agents in parallel. Each judge operates independently without seeing others' reviews. …
How to use it
Reference it in AdaL, Claude Code, Cursor or any coding agent — nothing to install:
@skills neolabhq/critique--37d2ca