Agent skill · research science · imbad0202
academic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
Why this skill is useful
Adds a dynamic multi-perspective review process with structured outputs that the AI cannot generate independently.
What it needs
About 10k tokens when loaded. Last updated 2026-08-07. 41,196 stars on the source repository.
What this skill does
Academic Paper Reviewer v1.11.1 — Multi-Perspective Academic Paper Review Agent Team Simulates a complete international journal peer review process: automatically identifies the paper's field, dynamically configures 4 card-backed identities (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer reviewers), and adds the fixed Devil's Advocate as the fifth execution seat. The five role-separated perspectives cover journal fit, methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary viewpoints, and core argument challenges; a separate editorial synthesizer produces the structured Editorial Decision and Revision Roadmap. v1.1 Improvements: 1. Added Devil's Advocate Reviewer — specifically challenges core arguments, detects logical fallacies, and identifies the strongest counter-arguments 2. Added re-review mode — verification review, focused on checking whether revisions address the review comments 3. Expanded review team from 4 to 5 members Routing discipline (v3.9.2): see .claude/CLAUDE.md "Routing Discipline (v3.9.2)" + shared/references/intentclarificationprotocol.md for cross-skill routing rules. This skill assumes routing has already settled — ambiguous cross-phase materials should have been clarified upstream. --- Quick Start Simplest command: Output: 1. Automatically identifies the paper's field and methodology type 2. Dynamically configures four card-backed reviewer identities; the fixed Devil's Advocate is the fifth execution seat 3. 5 role-separated review reports (4 configuration cards plus the fixed Devil's Advocate, with typed execution provenance) 4. …
How to use it
Reference it in AdaL, Claude Code, Cursor or any coding agent — nothing to install:
@skills imbad0202/academic-paper-reviewer