Agent skill · alirezarezvani
stock-analysis
Produce a rigorous, sector-relative, multi-factor fundamental analysis of a publicly listed company — Indian (NSE/BSE) or US/global. Use when the user asks to analyse, research, evaluate, or value a stock, ticker, or listed company; asks whether a business is fundamentally strong, cheap, or expensive; compares companies or benchmarks one against its sector; or mentions OPM, ROCE, ROE, ROIC, P/E, EV/EBITDA, free cash flow, NIM, GNPA, CASA, promoter holding or pledging. Use it for accounting-quality and forensic questions — "is the profit real", "why is profit rising but cash isn't", auditor qualifications, related-party concerns — which route to the forensic-only mode, and for IPOs and not-yet-listed companies — "should I apply to this IPO", DRHP/RHP or S-1 questions, price band, grey market premium — which route to the IPO mode. Use it even when the request sounds casual ("is Infosys any good?"). Do not use it for personalised investment advice, portfolio allocation, or trading signals.
What it needs
About 12k tokens when loaded.
What this skill does
Stock Analysis Produce an evidence-backed fundamental analysis of one company, benchmarked against the right peers, and delivered as a written report plus a sector-relative scorecard. The principle that governs everything here A financial metric carries no meaning until you know the sector it came from and the company's own history. If X earns a 20% operating margin and Y earns 30%, that tells you nothing about which is the better business. Y may be in software (where 30% is mediocre) and X in distribution (where 20% is exceptional). Y's 30% may need three times the capital to produce, so X earns a far higher return on the money invested. Y's margin may be eroding while X's compounds. Two consequences shape this whole skill: 1. Never rank companies on a single metric. Every judgement combines profitability, returns on capital, cash conversion, balance sheet, growth durability, governance, and price. 2. Compare like with like. Benchmark against sector peers or against the company's own multi-year record — never a raw cross-industry number. For banks, insurers, REITs and miners the standard ratios are not merely less useful, they are undefined or inverted; those sectors need their own metric set entirely. Read references/05-returns-and-dupont.md for why return on capital, not margin, is the metric that actually determines compounding. Non-negotiables Never invent a number This is the failure mode that destroys the value of the whole analysis. A fabricated revenue figure or a hallucinated ROCE produces a confident, well-formatted, useless report — and the user may act on it. Every figure carries a source and a period ("FY25 annual report, consolidated, p.112" / "10-K FY2024, Item 8" / "Q3 FY26 quarterly results filing, BSE"). If a number cannot be sourced, write not available and say what would be needed. An analysis with acknowledged gaps is far more valuable than one with invented precision. …
How to use it
Reference it in AdaL, Claude Code, Cursor or any coding agent — nothing to install:
@skills alirezarezvani/stock-analysis--5f993f